Lindgreen, Adam ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (385kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Download (381kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purchasing and supply management professionals recognize the value of aggressive transactional sourcing, as well as of having cooperative relationships with suppliers. But what mix of transactional and relational purchasing are organizations using, and which should they use? A novel instrument is developed to measure organizations’ use of transaction purchasing, electronic purchasing, interactive purchasing, and network purchasing. Four mixes of practices are identified and labeled “transactional,” “interpersonal dyadic,” “interpersonal network,” and “integrative relational” configurations. Organizations using an integrative relational configuration generally outperform others. Irrespective of configuration, organizations use more interactive and network purchasing with suppliers of direct inputs but more transaction purchasing with suppliers of indirect inputs.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Purchasing; Suppliers; Strategic management |
Additional Information: | Pdf uploaded in accordance with publisher's policy at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0008-1256/ (accessed 27/02/2014). |
Publisher: | University of California |
ISSN: | 0008-1256 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Last Modified: | 11 Oct 2023 21:09 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/44694 |
Citation Data
Cited 33 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |