Blumler, Jay and Cushion, Stephen ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (179kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Journalism has advanced greatly as a field in its own right in recent decades. As well as a cause for celebration, however, this may give rise to concerns – in particular that scholars may pay increasing attention to the inner workings of journalistic institutions at the expense of their external ties, impact and significance, including their normative ones. It is true that important normative analyses have appeared in the literature, six of which the article defines and exemplifies. So far, however, these ideas have had relatively little influence on the thought or practice of journalists. The article concludes by suggesting a way in which a closer and more constructive dialogue could be achieved between journalism scholars and practitioners, centring on the normative challenges faced by both sides.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Journalism, Media and Culture |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Civic engagement; comparative research; democracy; journalism studies; normative analysis; public communication |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications (UK and US) |
ISSN: | 1464-8849 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 8 August 2018 |
Last Modified: | 05 Dec 2024 20:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/50508 |
Citation Data
Cited 38 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |