Groves, Christopher Robert ![]() |
![]() |
Microsoft Word
Download (183kB) |
Abstract
It is argued that the social significance of nanotechnologies should be understood in terms of the politics and ethics of uncertainty. This means that the uncertainties surrounding the present and future development of nanotechnologies should not be interpreted, first and foremost, in terms of concepts of risk. It is argued that risk, as a way of managing uncertain futures, has a particular historical genealogy, and as such implies a specific politics and ethics. It is proposed, instead, that the concepts of contingency and of finitude must be central to any understanding of the ethical significance of nanotechnologies, as these concepts can be used to understand the basis of recent work in science and technology studies, and the sociology of knowledge more widely, which details the multi-dimensional social nature of technological uncertainty.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Law Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | T Technology > TP Chemical technology B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics H Social Sciences > HM Sociology |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nanotechnology ; Finitude ; Indeterminacy ; Novelty ; Risk ; Uncertainty |
Additional Information: | The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com |
Publisher: | Springer |
ISSN: | 1871-4765 |
Funders: | ESRC |
Last Modified: | 17 Oct 2022 09:42 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/5262 |
Citation Data
Cited 14 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |