The passive arbiter: litigants in person and the challenge to neutrality

Moorhead, Richard Lewis 2007. The passive arbiter: litigants in person and the challenge to neutrality. Social and Legal Studies 16 (3) , pp. 405-424. 10.1177/0964663907079766

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This article examines the challenges posed to judgecraft by litigants in person. It draws on significant empirical evidence from a study conducted by the author in England and Wales demonstrating the challenges posed by litigants in person to judges and the courts. It argues that a central concept behind traditional notions of judging, that of judge as passive arbiter, inhibits fair and effective adjudication. From an analysis of this evidence, it critiques the theoretical foundations of the passive arbiter and suggests an alternative approach to judging be formulated based on principle-based communication, a simpler, more empathetic and cognitively open approach to managing hearings prior to the actual judicial decision.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Schools > Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Publisher:	SAGE Publications
ISSN:	0964-6639
Last Modified:	10 Oct 2017 15:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/56306

Citation Data

Cited 26 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item