Kahane, Guy and Shackel, Nicholas. ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (112kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Neuroscience has recently turned to the study of utilitarian and non-utilitarian moral judgment. Koenigs et al.1 examined the responses of normal and ventromedial-prefrontal-cortex damaged subjects to moral scenarios drawn from fMRI studies by Greene et al.2,3,4 and claim that patients with VMPC damage have an abnormally ‘utilitarian’ pattern of moral judgment. It is crucial to Koenigs et al.’s claims that Greene et al.’s scenarios pose a conflict between utilitarian consequence and duty; however many of them do not meet this condition. Because of this methodological problem it is too early to claim that VMPC patients have a utilitarian bias.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group |
ISSN: | 0028-0836 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Last Modified: | 11 May 2023 05:48 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/6297 |
Citation Data
Cited 38 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |