Cave, E. and Holm, Soren 2003. Milgram and Tuskegee — paradigm research projects in bioethics. Health Care Analysis 11 (1) , pp. 27-40. 10.1023/A:1025333912720 |
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A102...
Abstract
This paper discusses the use of the Milgram obedience experiments and the Tuskegee syphilis study in the bioethical literature. The two studies are presented and a variety of uses of them identified and discussed. It is argued that the use of these studies as paradigms of problematic research relies on a reduction of their complexity. What is discussed is thus often constructions of these studies that are closer to hypothetical examples than to the real studies.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Law |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | deception; ethical argument; harm to research subjects; Milgram; research ethics; Tuskegee; use of examples |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 1065-3058 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jan 2020 04:58 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/66188 |
Citation Data
Cited 14 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |