Harris, J. and Holm, Soren 2002. Commentary on Skene and Parker: the role of a church (or other ideologically based interest group) in developing the law — a plea for ethereal intervention. Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4) , pp. 219-220. 10.1136/jme.28.4.219 |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.4.219
Abstract
This paper discusses the provocative views of Skene and Parker as to the role of religious or other ideologically based interest groups in law and policy making. We draw distinctions between doctrine and prejudice and between argument and ideology which we trust take the debate further. Finally we recommend an ethereal, democratic, and populist partial solution.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Schools > Law |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
ISSN: | 0306-6800 |
Date of Acceptance: | 14 February 2002 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jan 2020 04:58 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/66190 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |