Do methods of assessment accurately reflect the priorities of conservation teaching?

Henderson, Jane ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-8452 and Parkes, Phillip John ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-1635 2014. Do methods of assessment accurately reflect the priorities of conservation teaching? Presented at: ICOM-CC 17th Triennial Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 15-19 September 2014. Published in: Bridgland, Janet ed. ICOM-CC 17th Triennial Conference Preprints, Melbourne, 15–19 September 2014. Paris: International Council of Museums, 0304.

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper considers a range of assessment methods available in conservation, it evaluates aspects by which they can be described and evaluates the priorities expressed by stakeholder groups. Responses show that there is a strong community of practice with all conservators having similar priorities for conservation assessment with conservation practice being the priority for all. The authors use this data to rate the applicability of the different assessment methods to the stakeholders priorities based on their specific use in a conservation teaching context at Cardiff University. This illustrates how educators can review forms of assessments to ensure that what the students are assessed in, and therefore what they learn, matches with the expectations of different communities.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	History, Archaeology and Religion
Subjects:	L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LC Special aspects of education
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Assessment, AHP, conservation, learning, Cardiff University.
Publisher:	International Council of Museums
ISBN:	9789290124108
ISSN:	2312-9964
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	30 March 2016
Last Modified:	14 Nov 2022 08:16
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/67729

Citation Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item