| Jones, Peter M. and Pearce, John M.  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-8650
      2014.
      
      The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.
      Learning and Behavior
      
      
      
      
      10.3758/s13420-014-0162-x | 
| Preview | PDF
 - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (500kB) | Preview | 
Abstract
Pearce, Dopson, Haselgrove, and Esber (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 167–179, 2012) conducted a series of experiments with rats and pigeons in which the conditioned responding elicited by two types of redundant cue was compared. One of these redundant cues was a blocked cue X from A+ AX+ training, whereas the other was cue Y from a simple discrimination BY+ CY–. Greater conditioned responding was elicited by X than by Y; we refer to this difference as the redundancy effect. To test an explanation of this effect in terms of comparator theory (Denniston, Savastano, & Miller, 2001), a single group of rats in Experiment 1 received training of the form A+ AX+ BY+ CY–, followed by anA– Y+ discrimination. Responding to the individual cues was tested both before and after the latter discrimination. In addition to a replication of the redundancy effect during the earlier test, we observed stronger responding to B than to X, both during the earlier test and, in contradiction of the theory, after the A– Y+ discrimination. In Experiment 2, a blocking group received A+ AX+, a continuous group received AX+ BX–, and a partial group received AX± BX± training. Subsequent tests with X again demonstrated the redundancy effect, but also revealed a stronger response in the partial than in the continuous group. This pattern of results is difficult to explain with error-correction theories that assume that stimuli compete for associative strength during conditioning. We suggest, instead, that the influence of a redundant cue is determined by its relationship with the event with which it is paired, and by the attention it is paid.
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Date Type: | Publication | 
| Status: | Published | 
| Schools: | Schools > Psychology | 
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology | 
| Publisher: | Psychonomic Society | 
| ISSN: | 1543-4494 | 
| Funders: | BBSRC | 
| Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 | 
| Last Modified: | 24 May 2023 17:24 | 
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/69197 | 
Citation Data
Cited 17 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
|  | Edit Item | 

 
							

 Dimensions
 Dimensions Dimensions
 Dimensions