Taylor, George Benedict
2014.
Richard Rorty’s anti-representationalism:
a critical study.
PhD Thesis,
Cardiff University.
Item availability restricted. |
![]() |
PDF
- Supplemental Material
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (108kB) |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this study I argue that Richard Rorty’s anti-representationalist philosophy arises from a misguided belief that realists are compelled to argue that we need a single and exclusive “mirror-like” form of representation to capture reality. I argue that Rorty fails to appreciate the fact that realists do not have to absolutely identify reality with a particular mirror-like representation of it and nor do they have to fall prey to an invidious distinction between reality and the various ways that we do represent it. I argue that we need not associate realism with the kind of absolutism that Rorty associates it with. To illustrate this I challenge Rorty’s attempt to claim that Nietzsche also rejects realism and interpret Nietzsche’s perspectivism as a form of realism. I also challenge Rorty’s anti-representationalism in the context of his political philosophy. In order to do this I assess the role that Rorty assigns to the poet in his liberal utopia by examining the work of Sylvia Plath and Tony Harrison. I also discuss the various positions that Hilary Putnam has adopted in order to explore different possibilities within realism and representationalism. I conclude that Putnam’s internal realism concedes too much to Rorty and that his earlier external realism is a better alternative.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) |
---|---|
Status: | Unpublished |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 10 January 2024 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jan 2024 10:53 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/71408 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |