Li, Dai, Minford, Anthony Patrick Leslie ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (825kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1071477
Abstract
We use available methods for testing macro models to evaluate a model of China over the period from Deng Xiaoping’s reforms up until the crisis period. Bayesian ranking methods are heavily influenced by controversial priors on the degree of price/wage rigidity. When the overall models are tested by Likelihood or Indirect Inference methods, the New Keynesian model is rejected in favour of one with a fair-sized competitive product market sector. This model behaves quite a lot more ‘flexibly’ than the New Keynesian.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World > DS Asia H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | China, DSGE, Bayesian Inference, Indirect Inference |
Publisher: | Routledge |
ISSN: | 0003-6846 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 2 July 2015 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2024 18:06 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/75350 |
Citation Data
Cited 14 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |