Irvine, Elizabeth ![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.001
Abstract
Snodgrass et al.’s (2009) commentary makes explicit one of the major problems in consciousness research; that there seem to be just as many definitions of basic terms are there are people in the field. Although Snodgrass et al.’s position appears at odds with the views expressed in Irvine (2009), many of their arguments are actually consistent with the proposed views, or else fail to engage with them as a consequence of the shifting goal posts of what basic terms mean.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 1053-8100 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2024 03:42 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/78819 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |