Wood, Astrid 2016. Tracing policy movements: methods for studying learning and policy circulation. Environment and Planning A 48 (2) , pp. 391-406. 10.1177/0308518X15605329 |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (175kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Policy flows are not quantifiable and calculating processes but part of the uneven movement of ideas and experiences that involves power and personalities. Processes of learning and policy circulation have thus proven difficult to study especially as the exchanges taking place between actors and localities rarely lead directly to uptake. This paper outlines a conceptual and methodological framework for conducting policy mobilities research by attending to the plethora of ordinary practices – be it through engagements with fellow practitioners, their toolbox of material solutions, or a particular moment of discovery – that form the assemblages of learning. The paper then unveils a set of procedures for unravelling the assemblage, first by “following the people” and their understandings of mobile policy; second, by “following the materials” to experiment with a Latourian approach to materiality; and finally, by “following the meetings”, that is, the conferences, workshops and seminars where the people and materials mingle. The proposed methodology is sensitive to the ephemeral, ethereal and experiential assemblages that carve and sustain the pathways for the movement of knowledge. This interpretation of the methods for studying mobile knowledge is a critical predecessor to any empirical analysis of policy mobilities.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Geography and Planning (GEOPL) |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Last Modified: | 13 May 2023 12:31 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/78886 |
Citation Data
Cited 54 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |