Robertson, Simon ![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00155.x
Abstract
This paper responds to Susan Hurley's attempt to undermine the adequacy of the distinction at the heart of the internalism-externalism debate about reasons for action. The paper shows that Hurley's argument fails and then, more positively, indicates a neat way to characterize the distinction.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell |
ISSN: | 0066-7374 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2022 09:12 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/80162 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |