Difficulty giving feedback on underperformance undermines the educational value of multi-source feedback

Ingram, John R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5257-1142, Anderson, Elizabeth J. and Pugsley, Lesley 2013. Difficulty giving feedback on underperformance undermines the educational value of multi-source feedback. Medical Teacher 35 (10) , pp. 838-846. 10.3109/0142159X.2013.804910

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Multi-source feedback (MSF) was intended to provide both a summative and formative assessment of doctors’ attitudes and behaviours. Aims: To explore the influences of feedback quality and trainees’ acceptance of the assessment on formative educational gains from MSF. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of eight dermatology trainees, from an insider researcher position, following two pilot interviews. Interviews were manually transcribed and coded to permit template analysis, a subtype of thematic analysis. Results: The interview data indicated that MSF provides relatively little formative educational gains largely because of a paucity of constructive feedback on sub-optimal performance. This was due to difficulties encountered by raters giving developmental feedback, in particular, potential loss of anonymity, and by trainees selecting raters expected to give favourable comments. Dual use of MSF as a summative assessment in annual appraisals also inhibited educational gains by promotion of a ‘tick box’ mentality in which trainees’ need to pass their assessment superseded their desire for self-improvement. Conclusions: A relative lack of developmental feedback limits the formative educational gains from MSF and could provide false reassurance that might reinforce negative behaviours.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher:	Informa Healthcare
ISSN:	0142-159X
Last Modified:	31 Oct 2022 10:27
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/84979

Citation Data

Cited 8 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item