Collins, Harold Maurice ![]() |
Official URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B%3APHEN....
Abstract
I respond to Selinger and Mix (Selinger, E. and Mix, J. 2004. On interactional expertise: Pragmatic and ontological considerations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 145–163), concentrating on their charges that Collins (Collins, H. M. 2004a. Interactional expertise as a third form of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 125–143) underrates the importance of interactional expertise as an expertise sui generis and that the paper fails to analyse the idea of embodiment sufficiently holistically, misleading treating the ‘body’ as no more than the linear sum of its parts.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | embodiment; expertise; interactional expertise |
Publisher: | Springer Netherlands |
ISSN: | 1568-7759 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2022 10:54 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/86635 |
Citation Data
Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |