Ethics and the neuroscientific study of leadership: a synthesis and rejoinder to Ashkanasy, Cropanzano and Becker, and McLagan

Lindebaum, Dirk 2013. Ethics and the neuroscientific study of leadership: a synthesis and rejoinder to Ashkanasy, Cropanzano and Becker, and McLagan. Journal of Management Inquiry 22 (3) , pp. 317-323. 10.1177/1056492613478515

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This article represents a synthesis and rejoinder to the response articles by Ashkanasy, Cropanzano and Becker, and McLagan (this issue). First, I remind the readers of the key points I raised in the originating article (this issue), followed by clarifications on where respondents misunderstood my intentions and arguments. Third, I will synthesize the respondents’ main arguments by way of highlighting both converging and diverging perspectives on my critique. Finally, I conclude the article with some thoughts and suggestions for the future development of the debate.

Item Type:	Article
Status:	Published
Schools:	Business (Including Economics)
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Publisher:	Sage
ISSN:	1056-4926
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	1 April 2016
Last Modified:	27 Mar 2020 02:34
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/88505

Citation Data

Cited 7 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item