Lindebaum, Dirk and Raftopoulou, Effi 2017. What would John Stuart Mill say? A Utilitarian perspective on contemporary neuroscience debates in leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 144 , pp. 813-822. 10.1007/s10551-014-2247-z |
Abstract
The domain of organizational neuroscience increasingly influences leadership research and practice in terms of both selection and interventions. The dominant view is that the use of neuroscientific theories and methods offers better and refined predictions of what constitutes good leadership. What has been omitted so far, however, is a deeper engagement with ethical theories. This engagement is imperative as it helps problematize a great deal of the current advocacy around organizational neuroscience. In this article, we draw upon John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Utility as a theoretical framework to this end. Our discussion reveals several negative psychological and physical side-effects, which undermine the prevailing view that neuroscientific methods can be used without risk at work. We discuss the theoretical and practical ramifications of our analysis.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Ethics; Leadership; John Stuart Mill; Organizational neuroscience; Utilitarianism |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 0167-4544 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 1 April 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 6 June 2014 |
Last Modified: | 10 Dec 2020 12:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/88507 |
Citation Data
Cited 7 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |