Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah and Wood, Fiona ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (467kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article outlines the contribution that ethnography could make to process evaluations for trials of complex health-behaviour interventions. Process evaluations are increasingly used to examine how health-behaviour interventions operate to produce outcomes and often employ qualitative methods to do this. Ethnography shares commonalities with the qualitative methods currently used in health-behaviour evaluations but has a distinctive approach over and above these methods. It is an overlooked methodology in trials of complex health-behaviour interventions that has much to contribute to the understanding of how interventions work. These benefits are discussed here with respect to three strengths of ethnographic methodology: (1) producing valid data, (2) understanding data within social contexts, and (3) building theory productively. The limitations of ethnography within the context of process evaluations are also discussed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Medicine |
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Additional Information: | PDF uploaded in accordance with publisher's policies at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1745-6215/ (accessed 14.4.16). |
Publisher: | BioMed Central |
ISSN: | 1745-6215 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 13 April 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 6 April 2016 |
Last Modified: | 04 May 2023 19:04 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/89189 |
Citation Data
Cited 50 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |