Luintel, Kul B. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (790kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF (Discussion Paper)
- Supplemental Material
Download (724kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF (Online Appendix)
- Supplemental Material
Download (396kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The existing weight of evidence suggests that financial structure (the classification of a financial system as bank-based versus market-based) is irrelevant for economic growth. This contradicts the common belief that the institutional structure of a financial system matters. We re-examine this issue using a novel dataset covering 69 countries over 1989-2011 in a Bayesian framework. Our results are conformable to the belief - a market-based system is relevant - with sizable economic effects for the high-income but not for the middle-and-low-income countries. Our findings provide a counterexample to the weight of evidence. We also identify a regime shift in 2008.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HG Finance |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Financial Structure; Economic Growth; Cointegration; Bayesian Model Averaging; Structural Breaks |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 1042-4431 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 25 April 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 2 April 2016 |
Last Modified: | 06 Nov 2024 04:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/89893 |
Citation Data
Cited 31 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |