The validity of subjective performance measures: School principals in Texas and Denmark

Meier, Kenneth ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-0855, Winter, Soren C., O'Toole, Laurence J., Favero, Nathan and Andersen, Simon Calmar 2015. The validity of subjective performance measures: School principals in Texas and Denmark. Public Administration 93 (4) , pp. 1084-1101. 10.1111/padm.12180

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Public management studies are increasingly using survey data on managers' perceptions of performance to measure organizational performance. These perceptual measures are tempting to apply because archival performance data or surveys of target group outcomes and satisfaction are often lacking, costly to provide, and are highly policy specific rendering generalization difficult. But are perceptual performance measures valid, and do they generate unbiased findings? We examine these questions in a comparative study of middle managers in schools in Texas and Denmark. The findings are remarkably similar. Managers systematically overestimate the performance of their organization, perceptual performance is only weakly associated with archival performance, and managers do not provide sophisticated assessment of performance by giving their organization credit for the constraints it meets or discounting the resources it has. Even worse, the use of perceptual performance measures seems to provide biased estimates when examining how management affects performance. This is due to both random measurement error and common source bias.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Business (Including Economics)
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	0033-3298
Date of Acceptance:	2 March 2015
Last Modified:	01 Nov 2022 11:23
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/94789

Citation Data

Cited 16 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item