Upton, Stevie and Warshaw, Jarrett B. 2017. Evidence of hybrid institutional logics in the U.S. public research university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 39 (1) , pp. 89-103. 10.1080/1360080X.2017.1254380 |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
While the ascendancy of market behaviours in public research universities is well documented, the extent to which universities have transformed themselves into industry-like organisations has been called into question. So to what extent are universities displaying transformation in their core values? The concept of institutional logics, with its focus on the relationship between organisational design and underlying beliefs and values, shows potential to address this question. Yet study of institutional logics at the campus level has to date been limited. This paper presents an empirical analysis of three U.S. research universities’ organising principles as expressed in key mission and planning documents over a fifteen-year period. Of the multiple strategies at play in the universities’ responses to potentially competing values, the creation of new, hybrid logics is of particular interest. The concept of hybrid logics suggests a promising framework for understanding how universities can and do manage tensions in their mission.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Geography and Planning (GEOPL) |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > G Geography (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | institutional logics; hybrid logics; higher education; public research universities; mission; values. |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 1360-080X |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 27 October 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 3 October 2016 |
Last Modified: | 05 May 2023 20:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/95671 |
Citation Data
Cited 15 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |