The global prevalence of depression and anxiety among doctors during the covid-19 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis

Johns, G., Samuel, V., Freemantle, L., Lewis, J. and Waddington, L. 2022. The global prevalence of depression and anxiety among doctors during the covid-19 pandemic: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 298 (Part A) , pp. 431-441. 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.026

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background This review provides an estimate of the global prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms among doctors, based on analysis of evidence from the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify suitable studies. Final searches were conducted on 3rd March 2021. Papers were initially screened by title and abstract, based on pre-agreed inclusion criteria, followed by full-text review of eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Data from studies rated as low or medium risk of bias were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity. Results Fifty-five studies were included after full-text review. Of these, thirty studies were assessed as low or medium risk of bias and were included in primary analyses. These comprised twenty-six studies of depression (31,447 participants) and thirty studies of anxiety (33,281 participants). Pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety was 20.5% (95% CI 16.0%-25.3%) and 25.8% (95% CI 20.4%-31.5%) respectively. Interpretation Evidence from the first year of the pandemic suggests that a significant proportion of doctors are experiencing high levels of symptoms of depression and anxiety, although not conclusively more so than pre-pandemic levels. Differences in study methodology and variation in job demands may account for some of the observed heterogeneity. Limitations Findings must be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity and moderate risk of bias evident in the majority of included studies.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	0165-0327
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	1 December 2021
Date of Acceptance:	11 November 2021
Last Modified:	21 Nov 2024 10:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/145853

Citation Data

Cited 12 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item