Patients' experiences of attending emergency departments where primary care services are located: qualitative findings from patient and clinician interviews from a realist evaluation

Price, Delyth, Edwards, Michelle, Davies, Freya ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-1100, Cooper, Alison ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8660-6721, McFadzean, Joy, Carson-Stevens, Andrew ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-7699, Cooke, Matthew, Dale, Jeremy, Evans, Bridie Angela, Harrington, Barbara, Hepburn, Julie, Niroshan Siriwardena, Aloysius, Snooks, Helen and Edwards, Adrian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6228-4446 2022. Patients' experiences of attending emergency departments where primary care services are located: qualitative findings from patient and clinician interviews from a realist evaluation. BMC Emergency Medicine 22 (12) 10.1186/s12873-021-00562-9

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background Patient experience is an important outcome and indicator of healthcare quality, and patient reported experiences are key to improving quality of care. While patient experience in emergency departments (EDs) has been reported in research, there is limited evidence about patients’ specific experiences with primary care services located in or alongside EDs. We aim to identify theories about patient experience and acceptability of being streamed to a primary care clinician in an ED. Methods Using theories from a rapid realist review as a basis, we interviewed 24 patients and 106 staff members to generate updated theories about patient experience and acceptability of streaming to primary care services in EDs. Feedback from 56 stakeholders, including clinicians, policymakers and patient and public members, as well as observations at 13 EDs, also contributed to the development of these theories, which we present as a programme theory. Results We found that patients had no expectations or preferences for which type of clinician they were seen by, and generally found being streamed to a primary care clinician in the ED acceptable. Clinicians and patients reported that patients generally found primary care streaming acceptable if they felt their complaint was dealt with suitably, in a timely manner, and when clinicians clearly communicated the need for investigations, and how these contributed to decision-making and treatment plans. Conclusions From our findings, we have developed a programme theory to demonstrate that service providers can expect that patients will be generally satisfied with their experience of being streamed to, and seen by, primary care clinicians working in these services. Service providers should consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of implementing primary care services at their ED. If primary care services are implemented, clear communication is needed between staff and patients, and patient feedback should be sought.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Additional Information:	This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Publisher:	BioMed Central
ISSN:	1471-227X
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	14 December 2021
Date of Acceptance:	7 December 2021
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2023 20:58
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/146141

Citation Data

Cited 2 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item