Chandler, Jake and Booth, Richard ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Discussions of the issue of iterated belief revision are commonly accompanied by the presentation of three “concrete” operators: natural, restrained and lexicographic. This raises a natural question: What is so distinctive about these three particular methods? Indeed, the common axiomatic ground for work on iterated revision, the AGM and Darwiche-Pearl postulates, leaves open a whole range of alternative proposals. In this paper, we show that it is satisfaction of an additional principle of “Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives”, inspired by the literature on Social Choice, that unites and sets apart our three “elementary” revision operators. A parallel treatment of iterated belief contraction is also given, yielding a family of elementary contraction operators that includes, besides the well-known “conservative” and “moderate” operators, a new contraction operator that is related to restrained revision.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag (Germany) |
ISSN: | 0022-3611 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 14 June 2022 |
Date of Acceptance: | 10 May 2022 |
Last Modified: | 24 May 2023 00:12 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/150484 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |