Handling incomplete or late-onset toxicities in early-phase dose-finding clinical trials: current practice and future prospects

Yin, Zhulin, Mander, Adrian P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-9040, de Bono, Johann S., Zheng, Haiyan and Yap, Christina 2024. Handling incomplete or late-onset toxicities in early-phase dose-finding clinical trials: current practice and future prospects. JCO Precision Oncology 8 10.1200/PO.23.00441

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (566kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose The way late-onset toxicities are managed can affect trial outcomes and participant safety. Specifically, participants often might not have completed their entire follow-up period to observe any toxicities before new participants would be recruited. We conducted a methodological review of published early-phase dose-finding clinical trials that used designs accounting for partial and complete toxicity information, aiming to understand (1) how such designs were implemented and reported and (2) if sufficient information was provided to enable the replicability of trial results. Methods Until March 26, 2023, we identified 141 trials using the rolling 6 design, the time-to-event continuous reassessment method (TITE-CRM), the TITE-CRM with cycle information, the TITE Bayesian optimal interval design, the TITE cumulative cohort design, and the rapid enrollment design. Clinical settings, design parameters, practical considerations, and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) information were extracted from these published trials. Results The TITE-CRM (61, 43.3%) and the rolling 6 design (76, 53.9%) were most frequently implemented in practice. Trials using the TITE-CRM had longer DLT assessment windows beyond the first cycle compared with the rolling 6 design (52.5% v 6.6%). Most trials implementing the TITE-CRM (91.8%, 56 of 61) failed to describe essential parameters in the protocols or the study result papers. Only five TITE-CRM trials (8.2%, 5 of 61) reported sufficient information to enable replication of the final analysis. Conclusion When compared with trials using the rolling 6 design, those implementing the TITE-CRM design exhibited notable deficiencies in reporting essential details necessary for reproducibility. Inadequate reporting quality of advanced model-based trial designs hinders their credibility. We provide recommendations that can improve transparency, reproducibility, and accurate interpretation of the results for such designs.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR)
Publisher:	American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN:	2473-4284
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	28 March 2024
Date of Acceptance:	12 October 2023
Last Modified:	05 Apr 2024 14:15
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/167595

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item