Souto-Otero, Manuel ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The article examines, primarily based on large-scale survey data, the functionalist proposition that HE customers, students and employers, demand rankings to be able to adopt informed decisions on where to study and who to recruit respectively. This is contrasted to a Weberian ‘conflict’ perspective on rankings in which positional competition is key. The article concludes that rankings are better understood as instruments in positional competition for a minority of global players. They are a crucial source of information only for particular groups of international students and employers. The empirical analysis further suggests that the state of economic development, cultural aspects and the availability of top-ranked institutions in the home HE system are important factors in explaining differences in the importance of rankings across countries. We conclude by arguing that national governments and HE institutions should re-visit the assumption of a wide-spread importance of rankings for students and employers.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HA Statistics H Social Sciences > HM Sociology L Education > L Education (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Higher education, higher education policy, globalisation, higher education rankings |
Additional Information: | PDF uploaded in accordance with publisher's policies at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0307-5079/ (accessed 25.9.15). |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
ISSN: | 0307-5079 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 6 July 2015 |
Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2024 14:30 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/76970 |
Citation Data
Cited 20 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |